This study proposes to investigate the tau
protein associated with depression. This systematic review follows the PRISMA methodology (5) with two parallel reviews.
After review, a meta-analysis will proceed.
The question (PECOS) under study
was: Do individuals (P) exposed to high levels of Tau protein (E), compared to
individuals with normal levels of Tau protein (C), exhibit a higher prevalence
of depression (O)? Case-control studies and other kinds of study that
discriminate between the control group and case of depression(S) were selected,
with the inclusion criterion for articles describing tau protein in individuals
with depression and the exclusion criterion being the lack of comparison of tau
protein levels with individuals without depression.
To be eligible,
studies had to meet the following criteria: They had to include a paper that
reported cardiovascular disease in individuals with Alzheimer’s. We excluded
every study that did not describe a possible association between cardiovascular
disease and Alzheimer's. Three authors systematically searched, read titles and
abstracts, and shared the findings of the eligible papers. Some cardiovascular
risk factors, such as diabetes and dyslipidemia, were not included as
cardiovascular disease. Studies that did not distinguish Alzheimer's disease
from other dementias, other vascular diseases not related to heart disease, and
simple comments were excluded.
Following the PRISMA, the defined
papers’ titles and abstracts are eligible and non-restricted languages without
time limits. Furthermore, it was systematically identified by searching
electronic databases Embase
[Emtree - Major Focus Exp.], Pubmed [Mesh Terms], and Lilacs - Complete
collection of the Virtual Health Library [Title/abstracts], in April 2024.
The data will be
extracted into two tables describing insomnia-related factors. Factors
associated with insomnia in the two parallel reviews will be compared through
exploratory factor analysis to identify and extract commonalities.
Data extraction will be performed independently by two reviewers (JFRR
and LPR) using a pre-piloted, standardized data extraction form. Discrepancies
will be resolved through discussion and consensus or with arbitration by a
third reviewer (GMAF).
One hundred and thirty-eight articles were found, eighteen of which were
repeated. One was written in Spanish, one in German, four in Mandarin, and the
others in English. All were read in full by one of the authors, and two read all abstracts. The two co-authors
who read all the abstracts agreed to exclude 42 articles that did not meet the
inclusion criteria and to read the four articles written in Chinese with the
help of AI Chat. The author, who read all the articles in full, agreed
with excluding 42 articles and noted the inappropriateness of another 57,
including 21 for data extraction.
Statistical analyses were
performed using SPSS version 29.