Rodents are housed under controlled environmental conditions, including a 12-hour light/dark cycle.
Mild water restriction is applied to encourage task engagement, ensuring that each animal receives a minimum of 1 mL of water per day to maintain proper hydration and welfare.
To minimize stress and facilitate task learning, animals undergo a habituation period before training, allowing them to acclimate to both handling and the experimental apparatus.
2. Training protocol
The training regimen begins with a three-day habituation phase (15-minute sessions per day), during which the water spout is positioned flush against the chamber wall (0 cm) at a height of 5.5 cm from the floor. This initial setup allows animals to associate the spout with the water reward.
Following habituation, the spout is incrementally shifted 1 cm away from the wall while maintaining the same height. This adjustment requires the mice to extend their forelimbs to obtain the water drop, reinforcing the reaching behavior.
Once mice consistently use their forelimbs to retrieve the water reward, formal training begins. Training continues for a minimum of four consecutive days, with daily 15-minute sessions.
3. Welfare monitoring
To ensure animal welfare, daily body weight measurements must be recorded. If an animal's weight drops below 90-85% of its baseline, both water restriction and task participation should be immediately suspended to prevent excessive stress or dehydration.
Additionally, general health and behavior should be monitored to detect signs of distress or adverse effects from training.
4. Performance assessment
A trial is considered successful if the mouse extends its forelimb, makes contact with the water drop, and successfully consumes it.
Key performance metrics include:
Success rate (percentage of successful trials)
Number of reaching attempts per session
Kinematic analysis of reaching movements
These parameters should be assessed across multiple days to evaluate sensorimotor learning and adaptation.
5. Considerations
If a mouse exhibits side bias (consistent preference for one forelimb), access to the preferred limb can be restricted using a physical barrier near the narrow aperture on the opposite side.
The setup allows for video recording of reaching behavior, as well as optogenetic inhibition or excitation (via opsin expression) to assess the neural mechanisms underlying forelimb control.
Include a reference marker in the video frame (e.g., a ruler or a known-distance object) to enable conversion from pixels to centimeters for kinematic analysis.
Video analysis can be performed manually or with automated tracking tools to extract detailed kinematic parameters:
Manual annotation can be done using software such as Kinovea, which allows frame-by-frame assessment of movement execution.
Automated kinematic tracking can be achieved using DeepLabCut or similar deep-learning-based approaches to track body points, enabling precise movement quantification.
These analyses help to extract fine-grained motor features such as velocity, trajectory, and limb coordination, providing a more comprehensive assessment of motor function and learning.