Apr 16, 2025

Public workspaceA Procedure to Test Biofilm Formation Capacities of Listeria Monocytogenes Strains Under Conditions Simulating Natural Meat Processing Conditions

  • Diana Soosai1,
  • Beverly Phipps-Todd1,
  • Min Lin1,
  • Burton Blais2,
  • Hongsheng Huang1
  • 1Ottawa Laboratory – Fallowfield, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Nepean, Ontario, Canada;
  • 2Ottawa Laboratory – Carling, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, Nepean, Ontario, Canada
Icon indicating open access to content
QR code linking to this content
Protocol CitationDiana Soosai, Beverly Phipps-Todd, Min Lin, Burton Blais, Hongsheng Huang 2025. A Procedure to Test Biofilm Formation Capacities of Listeria Monocytogenes Strains Under Conditions Simulating Natural Meat Processing Conditions. protocols.io https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.5qpvooyedv4o/v1
License: This is an open access protocol distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License,  which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Protocol status: Working
We use this protocol and it's working
Created: March 31, 2025
Last Modified: April 16, 2025
Protocol Integer ID: 126688
Keywords: Listeria monocytogenes, Biofilm, Conditions simulating natural meat processing conditions, In vitro biofilm bioassay
Funders Acknowledgements:
CFIA project
Grant ID: OLF-F-1306
Abstract
Biofilm formation is believed to be one of the mechanisms that enables Listeria monocytogenes, a food-borne bacterial pathogen, to persist in food processing plants. It is important to determine the differential abilities of biofilm formation of various L. monocytogenes strains under natural conditions for gaining insights into this mechanism and for developing effective mitigation strategies. The protocol presented here outlines an in vitro biofilm assay developed in our laboratory to detect biofilm formation in L. monocytogenes strains. This assay uses a standard crystal violet biofilm assay in a novel model (in-house prepared Beef Broth, 12ºC), closely simulating natural meat processing environments. The biofilm formation is measured using optical density values and confirmed morphologically using inverted microscopy and scanning electron microscopy.
Guidelines
Background
Listeria monocytogenes, a Gram-positive food-borne pathogen, can cause a serious infection in humans called listeriosis. Individuals in vulnerable groups, such as newborns, the elderly, pregnant women, and the immunocompromised, are particularly at higher risk. The pathogen has been shown to persist in harsh food processing environments, posing a significant threat to public health. This persistence is primarily attributed to its ability to form biofilms. Therefore, understanding the biofilm-forming ability of L. monocytogenes by testing strains under simulated meat processing conditions is crucial, as it provides insight into its persistence in these challenging environments. Previously, we conducted a study to test the biofilm formation capacities of 67 L. monocytogenes strains and obtained biofilm OD595 values (optical density values at 595 nm) that ranged from OD595 0.076±0.035 to 0.517±0.027.

Purpose
This protocol is to describe a biofilm bioassay simulating the food processing environment to measure biofilm formation of Listeria monocytogenes in beef broth at 12ºC following 9 days of incubation (Soosai D, 2017).

License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Trouble shooting
  1. Check the sterility of the in-house prepared beef broth by incubating the broth and 2 BHI agar plates streaked with the broth at Temperature37 °C DurationOvernight .
  2. Include negative and positive controls for biofilm bioassay to ensure there is no cross contamination.
  3. Wash the tissue culture plates gently without disturbing the biofilms in the well.
  4. Slightly variations in counts between wells of the same strain may be observed. To obtain more accurate results, it is recommended to include more than 3 replicates.



Materials
Bacterial strains

All isolates of L. monocytogenes are used immediately after isolation or stored in Brain and Heart Infusion (BHI) broth containing 25% (v/v) sterile glycerol at –80 ºC until use.

Reagents

  • Glycerol (Catalogue# G5150, Sigma, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada or equivalent), Sterilized by autoclaving at 121 ºC.
  • TSB supplemented with 0.6% (w/v) yeast extract (YE) (Catalogue# LP0021, OXOID, Nepean, Ontario, Canada) [TSB-YE].
  • In-house Beef Broth (BB) 0.1% (v/v) (Section: Preparation of 1% (v/v) beef broth (BB) in sterile MQ water).
  • Phosphate buffered saline (PBS, 0.01M, pH 7.2).
  • Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar plates.
  • Sterile Milli-Q (MQ) water (autoclaved).
  • Gram’s crystal violet (Cat# 4312526, BD, through Fisher Scientific, Nepean, Ontario, Canada).
  • 95% (v/v) ethanol (de-staining solution).
  • 2.5% glutaraldehyde (EM Grade 70% solution, Cat. #16365, Electron Microscopy Sciences)
  • 2% osmium tetroxide (Cat. #19134, Electron Microscopy Sciences)
  • Silver conductive adhesive (Cat. #12684-15, Electron Microscopy Sciences)

Equipments

  • 24 well non-treated tissue culture plates (Cat # 08772-51, Falcon, through Fisher Scientific, Nepean, Ontario, Canada).
  • Stomacher 400 circulator, Seward, Worthing, West Sussex, U.K, with Stomacher® closure bag (Cat# BA6141/CLR, Seward), Stomacher® filter bag (Cat# BA6141/STR, Seward).
  • Allegra X-15R Centrifuge, Beckman Coulter, Brea, California, USA.
  • Titer plate shaker (Model # 4625, Lab - Line Instrument Inc., Melrose Park, Illinois, USA).
  • Microplate reader (Cat # 168-1135, Bio-Rad i-Mark Microplate Reader, Hercules, California, USA).
  • UV-Vis Spectrophotometer (Genesys 10S UV-Vis Spectrophotometer, Thermo Scientific).
  • A vacuum hand operator for aspiration (Integra Biosciences™ Vacuboy Hand Operator, Thermo Fisher Scientific).
  • Inverted microscope (option: Zeiss Axiovert 10 inverted microscope (Oberkochen, Germany).
  • Scanning Electron Microscopy (optional).
  • cell culture microscope slides (Cat. #71888, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, Pennsylvania, USA)
  • 12.7 mm slotted stubs (Cat. #75210, Electron Microscopy Sciences)
  • 12 mm Pelco carbon conductive tabs (Cat. #16084-1, Ted Pella Inc., Redding, California, USA)


ReagentGlycerolMerck MilliporeSigma (Sigma-Aldrich)Catalog #G5150
ReagentOxoid™ Yeast Extract Powder, 500gThermo FisherCatalog #LP0021B
ReagentBD Gram Crystal VioletFisher ScientificCatalog #B4312526
ReagentFalcon™ Polystyrene MicroplatesFisher ScientificCatalog #08-772-51
ReagentStomacher® 400 Circulator Standard BagSewardCatalog #BA6141/5
ReagentPELCO Tabs™, Carbon Conductive Tabs, 12mm ODTed Pella Inc.Catalog #16084-1
ReagentAqueous Glutaraldehyde EM Grade 70%Electron Microscopy SciencesCatalog #16365
ReagentOsmium TetroxideElectron Microscopy SciencesCatalog #19134
ReagentSilver Conductive 18Db70XElectron Microscopy SciencesCatalog #12684-15
ReagentAlM Mount Slotted HeadElectron Microscopy SciencesCatalog #75210

Preparation of 1% (v/v) Beef Broth (BB) in Sterile MQ Water
Preparation of 1% (v/v) Beef Broth (BB) in Sterile MQ Water
1h 12m
1h 12m
Commercial medium ground beef (approximately 23% fat) is purchased from a retail store.
Add beef to sterile MQ water in the ratio of 1:10 (w/v) in a Stomacher® closure bag.
Stomach at Shaker300 rpm, 00:02:00 .

2m
Centrifuge beef suspension at Centrifigation230 x g, 00:10:00 to spin down fat and cellular debris.

10m
Centrifigation
Add the suspension to a Stomacher® filter bag to remove the debris and collect the clear suspension from the filtered side of the bag.
Heat the suspension at Temperature72 °C in a water bath for Duration01:00:00 .

1h
Temperature
Aseptically aliquot the BB into 15 ml centrifuge tubes and store at Temperature-20 °C until use.

In Vitro Biofilm Assay
In Vitro Biofilm Assay
23h
23h
Culture isolates at Temperature37 °C DurationOvernight in Amount10-12 mL of (Tryptic Soya Broth (TSB) supplemented with 0.6% (w/v) yeast extract (YE) (TSB-YE) by inoculating 1/8th of a Amount10 µL loop from Brain Heart Infusion (BHI) agar plates and incubate for Duration22:00:00 .

22h
Overnight
Dilute overnight culture in phosphate buffered saline (PBS, Concentration0.01 Molarity (M) , pH Ph7.2 ) to the required OD600 value.
Note
OD600 0.180 – 0.230 which is approximately equivalent to 108 CFU/ml.


Dilute the culture suspension further to obtain a final concentration of 106 Colony forming unit per milliliter (CFU/ml) in BB.
Confirm the concentration of the diluted bacterial culture to be 106 CFU/ml by plating on BHI agar plates for each experiment.
Seed the wells of a 24 well culture plate with Amount2 mL of the bacterial suspension.

Use wells containing media alone as a negative control.
Use bacterial suspension from one strain identified as a strong biofilm former, either through literature or in-house testing, as the positive control.
Note
In our case, the overnight culture of the positive control strains is standardized to an OD600 0.120 – 0.130 (~107 CFU/ml) before performing the final dilution (~106 CFU/ml) for biofilm assay.

Incubate plates with lids on at Temperature12 °C for 9 days.

Incubation
Remove the culture supernatants gently either manually or by aspiration using a vacuum-based hand operator.
Rinse the plates three times with approximately Amount4 mL of water and allow to air dry.

Wash
Stain the biofilms by adding Amount2 mL of 0.1% (v/v) Gram’s crystal violet and incubate at ambient temperature for Duration00:30:00 .
30m
Incubation
Pipetting
Remove the dye and rinse the wells three times with MQ water.
Wash
De-stain the bound crystal violet by adding Amount0.5 mL of 95% (v/v) ethanol (de-staining solution) to the wells with shaking on a titer plate shaker for Duration00:30:00 .

30m
Pipetting
Confirm or verify the potential biofilm formation, if necessary, daily, or periodically by visualizing the crystal violet-stained biofilms in the wells of the 24 well plate for the controls and test strains using inverted light microscopy at x20 magnification. Figure 1 (as an example) and/or using scanning electron microscopy (image not shown).

Figure 1. Confirmation of the biofilm formation by inverted light microscopy. 
Figure 1: Inverted light microscopy images of L. monocytogenes biofilm formation. Images taken at a magnification of ×20 show clear differences in the formation of biofilms stained using crystal violet on days 1, 4 and 9 (the strongest formation) at 12 ºC in BB.

Transfer Amount200 µL of the dissolved crystal violet in the de-staining solution to wells of a 96 well plate and read using a microplate reader at 595 nm.
Pipetting
Morphological Confirmation of Biofilm Formation by Inverted Microscopy
Morphological Confirmation of Biofilm Formation by Inverted Microscopy
View crystal violet stained biofilms in the wells of the 24 well plate using an inverted microscope* at x20 magnification every day to verify potential formation of biofilms (Figure 1).
Note
*Optional: Zeiss Axiovert 10 inverted microscope, Oberkochen, Germany.

Morphological Confirmation of Biofilm Formation by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) (Optional)
Morphological Confirmation of Biofilm Formation by Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) (Optional)
8h 10m
8h 10m
Cut the uncoated polystyrene cell culture microscope slides (Cat. #71888, Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, Pennsylvania, USA) into approximately 11 mm squares using a scalpel and pliers.
Label the polystyrene coupons with a diamond marking pencil (Fisherbrand) and laboratory marker (VWR).
Sterilize the coupons with 100% ethanol for Duration00:20:00 followed by 70% ethanol for Duration00:20:00 and rinse in sterile MQ water prior to placing them into a sterile polystyrene 24-well plate containing bacterial culture in BB for the formation of biofilms.
40m
Wash
After biofilm formation, gently rinse the coupons 2 times with Concentration0.1 Molarity (M) phosphate buffer (pH Ph7.4 ) then fix with 2.5% glutaraldehyde (EM Grade 70% solution, Cat. #16365, Electron Microscopy Sciences) in Concentration0.1 Molarity (M) phosphate buffer (Ph7.4 ).

Store the coupons in fixative at Temperature4 °C (minimum Duration24:00:00 ) till further processing for SEM.
Allow the coupons to gently rotate on a shaker for continuous contact with fresh solution during the fixation and rinsing.
After fixation, rinse the coupons 4 times.

Wash
Rinse the coupons with Concentration0.1 Molarity (M) phosphate buffer for a minimum of Duration00:30:00 . (1/4)

30m
Rinse the coupons with Concentration0.1 Molarity (M) phosphate buffer for a minimum of Duration00:30:00 . (2/4)
30m
Rinse the coupons with Concentration0.1 Molarity (M) phosphate buffer for a minimum of Duration00:30:00 . (3/4)
30m
Rinse the coupons with Concentration0.1 Molarity (M) phosphate buffer for a minimum of Duration00:30:00 . (4/4)
30m
Then, post-fix in 2% osmium tetroxide (Cat. #19134, Electron Microscopy Sciences) in MQ water for Duration01:00:00 .

1h
Rinse the coupons in sterile MQ water for Duration00:15:00 to remove excess osmium tetroxide then dehydrate in graded series of ethanol (Anhydrous Ethyl Alcohol, Commercial Alcohols, Brampton, Ontario, Canada) as follows.

15m
Wash
Then, dehydrate in 30% ethanol Duration00:15:00 .

15m
Dehydrate in 50% ethanol Duration00:15:00 .
15m
Dehydrate in 70% ethanol Duration00:15:00 .
15m
Dehydrate in 85% ethanol Duration00:15:00 .
15m
Dehydrate in 95% ethanol Duration00:15:00 .
15m
Dehydrate in 100% ethanol for Duration01:00:00 . (1/3)

1h
Dehydrate in 100% ethanol for Duration01:00:00 .(2/3)
1h
Dehydrate in 100% ethanol for Duration01:00:00 .(3/3)
1h
Carry out the critical point drying using the Autosamdri – 814 (Rockville, Maryland, USA) critical point dryer.
Mount the coupons on 12.7 mm slotted stubs (Cat. #75210, Electron Microscopy Sciences) using silver conductive adhesive (Cat. #12684-15, Electron Microscopy Sciences) and 12 mm Pelco™ carbon conductive tabs (Cat. #16084-1, Ted Pella Inc., Redding, California, USA).
Sputter coat the mounted samples with gold using Emitech K550X Sputter Coater (Ashford, Kent, U.K).
Images taken at a Images taken at a View on a SEM (optional: FEI Quanta 600 SEM (Hillsboro, Oregon, USA).

Figure 2. Electronic microscopical confirmation of biofilm formation.
Figure 2. Electronic microscopical confirmation of biofilm formation. Images taken at a magnification of ×2000 (image A), x5000 (Image B) and ×8000 (image C) respectively. Arrows indicate cluster of cells and arrow heads indicate adherent cells. A: Negative control without bacterial inoculation showing debris from beef broth, scale bars, 20 μm. B. Biofilm formation with biofilm OD595 value of 0.491 ± 0.041. scale bars, 20 μm. C: Image of biofilms formed on day 9 at 12 ºC in BB on polystyrene coupons. Bacterial cells in clusters and adherent cells in the background can be observed, scale bar, 5μm.

Note
Time Taken
Generally, 10 – 11 days are required for the biofilm assay including 2 days for bacterial culture preparation, and 9 days of incubation for biofilm formation. 2 – 3 days would be required for microscopical and SEM examination.


Expected result
Anticipated results

The biofilm assay uses optical density (OD) measurements to quantify biofilm formation in L. monocytogenes isolates. Based on their respective OD values, these isolates can then be classified into three biofilm-forming phenotypes: strong, moderate, and weak.

Interpretation of results
The biofilm formation capacities are determined arbitrarily in potentially one of the three ways described below or using other methods preferred by users depending on the objectives of different studies.

  1. Define the negative, weak, moderate and strong formers by dividing the range between OD595 by 3, namely, OD ≤ OD negative control = no biofilm formation, OD595 lower 1/3 of the range = weak former, OD595 middle 1/3 of the range = moderate former, OD595 the upper 1/3 of the range = strong former.
  2. If OD ≤ OD of negative control without bacteria (ODC) = no biofilm formation, ODC < OD ≤ (2 × ODC) = weak biofilm formation, (2 × ODC) < OD ≤ (4 × ODC) = moderate biofilm formation, (4 × ODC) < OD = strong biofilm formation (Stepanović et al., 2004; Soosai D, 2017).
  3. Compare the biofilm formation capacities of different isolates using individual OD values, which can also be correlated with other measurements including genomics analysis (Soosai et al., 2021).

Imaging
Protocol references
Reference

Soosai, D.M. Identification of genetic determinants associated with biofilm formation capacity of Listeria monocytogenes. Master of Science thesis, University of Ottawa (2017). https://ruor.uottawa.ca/bitstream/10393/35601/1/Soosai_Diana_2017_thesis.pdf

Stepanović, S. et al. Biofilm formation by Salmonella spp. and Listeria monocytogenes on plastic surface. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 38, 428–432 (2004).

Soosai Diana Soosa, Min Lin, Burton Blais, Catherine Carrillo, Marc-Olivier Duceppe, Adams Koziol, Ray Alain, Vanessa Allen, Franco Pagotto, Hongsheng Huang. iPoster presentation: Investigation of Genetic Markers Associated with the Biofilm Formation Abilities of Listeria monocytogenes Strains. (Virtual) World Microbe Forum (organized by the American Society for Microbiology, Federation of European Microbiological Societies, and several other societies). June 20-24, 2021. Session AESP133 - AES14 Foodborne Pathogens. Poster#: WMF21-0398. https://wmf2021-asm.ipostersessions.com/Default.aspx?s=asm_gallery&token=ZZH.jOBp9.lewaAaWkVznF9GYYvPt6c9Rzm1QzaEkOY
Acknowledgements
We thank the financial support from Canadian Food Inspection Agency (CFIA)(CFIA project # OLF-F-1306).